1963 Contessa 26 vs 1984 Dehler 25 — Comparison

1963 Contessa 26
VS
1984 Dehler 25

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1963 Contessa 261984 Dehler 25
General
ManufacturerJeremy RogersDehler
Year1963–19801984–1992
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKGermany
DesignerDavid SadlerE.G. van de Stadt
Dimensions
LOA7.80 m (25.6 ft)7.50 m (24.6 ft)
LWL5.79 m (19.0 ft)6.30 m (20.7 ft)
Beam2.29 m (7.5 ft)2.50 m (8.2 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.35 m (4.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Ballast1,043 kg (2,299 lbs)680 kg (1,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area26.0 m² (280 ft²)22.5 m² (242 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine7 HP8 HP
Fuel Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)25 L (6.6 gal)
Water Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths44
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1963 Contessa 26
15.31
1984 Dehler 25
15.46
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1963 Contessa 26
45.99
1984 Dehler 25
37.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1963 Contessa 26
0.70
1984 Dehler 25
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1963 Contessa 26
28.29
1984 Dehler 25
18.41

Detailed Comparison

The 1963 Contessa 26 and 1984 Dehler 25 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Contessa 26 is a classic design by Jeremy Rogers from UK, while the 1984 Dehler 25 is a 1980s offering from Dehler from Germany. The 1963 Contessa 26 was penned by David Sadler. The 1984 Dehler 25 was designed by E.G. van de Stadt.

In terms of size, the 1963 Contessa 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.29m, compared to the 1984 Dehler 25 at 7.50m (24.6ft) with a 2.50m beam. The 1963 Contessa 26 is 0.30m longer than the 1984 Dehler 25. The 1963 Contessa 26 displaces approximately 26% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1963 Contessa 26 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.31 and 26.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Dehler 25, with an SA/D of 15.46 and 22.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 Dehler 25 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1963 Contessa 26 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 28.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1984 Dehler 25 has a comfort ratio of 18.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 46.0% for the 1963 Contessa 26 and 37.8% for the 1984 Dehler 25, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1963 Contessa 26 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 45L of water capacity and 23L of fuel. The 1984 Dehler 25 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 25L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1963 Contessa 26 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 Dehler 25 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1963 Contessa 26 · 1984 Dehler 25