1963 Contessa 26 vs 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1963 Contessa 26 | 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Jeremy Rogers | Pacific Seacraft |
| Year | 1963–1980 | 1986–2007 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | UK | USA |
| Designer | David Sadler | William Crealock |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.80 m (25.6 ft) | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) |
| LWL | 5.79 m (19.0 ft) | 5.94 m (19.5 ft) |
| Beam | 2.29 m (7.5 ft) | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) | 1.07 m (3.5 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,043 kg (2,299 lbs) | 953 kg (2,101 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 26.0 m² (280 ft²) | 24.0 m² (258 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Full |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 7 HP | 10 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 23 L (6.1 gal) | 30 L (7.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 45 L (11.9 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 4 |
| Cabins | 1 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1963 Contessa 26 and 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1963 Contessa 26 is a classic design by Jeremy Rogers from UK, while the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1963 Contessa 26 was penned by David Sadler. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was designed by William Crealock.
In terms of size, the 1963 Contessa 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.29m, compared to the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1963 Contessa 26 is 0.18m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25.
Looking at performance, the 1963 Contessa 26 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.31 and 26.0 m² of sail area. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, with an SA/D of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1963 Contessa 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1963 Contessa 26 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 28.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.70). The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has a comfort ratio of 25.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 46.0% for the 1963 Contessa 26 and 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1963 Contessa 26 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 45L of water capacity and 23L of fuel. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 30L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1963 Contessa 26 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1963 Contessa 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1963 Contessa 26 · 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25