1965 Bristol 35.5 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison

1965 Bristol 35.5
VS
Hunter 30Hunter 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1965 Bristol 35.5Hunter 30
General
ManufacturerBristolHunter
Year1965–19721991–1996
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHalsey HerreshoffHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA10.82 m (35.5 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area47.4 m² (510 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Bristol 35.5
14.75
Hunter 30
16.94
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Bristol 35.5
41.53
Hunter 30
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Bristol 35.5
0.66
Hunter 30
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Bristol 35.5
28.88
Hunter 30
19.54

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Bristol 35.5 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is a classic design by Bristol from USA, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 measures 10.82m (35.5ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is 1.68m longer than the Hunter 30. The 1965 Bristol 35.5 displaces approximately 53% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.75 and 47.4 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 28.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.66). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1965 Bristol 35.5 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Bristol 35.5 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1965 Bristol 35.5 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1965 Bristol 35.5 · Hunter 30