1965 Pearson Vanguard vs 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 — Comparison

1965 Pearson Vanguard1965 Pearson Vanguard
VS
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1965 Pearson Vanguard1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
General
ManufacturerPearsonPacific Seacraft
Year1965–19721986–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerPhilip RhodesWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA9.83 m (32.3 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)5.94 m (19.5 ft)
Beam2.84 m (9.3 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)953 kg (2,101 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area36.0 m² (388 ft²)24.0 m² (258 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
14.32
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
41.11
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
0.71
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
25.31
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard was penned by Philip Rhodes. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard measures 9.83m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is 2.21m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.32 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, with an SA/D of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has a comfort ratio of 25.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1965 Pearson Vanguard has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1965 Pearson Vanguard offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1965 Pearson Vanguard · 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25