1965 Pearson Vanguard vs 1987 Cape Dory 40 — Comparison

1965 Pearson Vanguard1965 Pearson Vanguard
VS
1987 Cape Dory 40

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1965 Pearson Vanguard1987 Cape Dory 40
General
ManufacturerPearsonCape Dory
Year1965–19721987–1992
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerPhilip RhodesCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA9.83 m (32.3 ft)12.19 m (40.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam2.84 m (9.3 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)8,618 kg (18,999 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area36.0 m² (388 ft²)64.5 m² (694 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)284 L (75.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
14.32
1987 Cape Dory 40
15.59
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
41.11
1987 Cape Dory 40
42.11
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
0.71
1987 Cape Dory 40
0.72
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
25.31
1987 Cape Dory 40
22.29

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 1987 Cape Dory 40 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1987 Cape Dory 40 is a 1980s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard was penned by Philip Rhodes. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard measures 9.83m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 1987 Cape Dory 40 at 12.19m (40.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 is 2.36m longer than the 1965 Pearson Vanguard. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 displaces approximately 111% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.32 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 1987 Cape Dory 40, with an SA/D of 15.59 and 64.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has a comfort ratio of 22.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.72. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 42.1% for the 1987 Cape Dory 40, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 284L water and 151L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1987 Cape Dory 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1965 Pearson Vanguard · 1987 Cape Dory 40