1965 Pearson Vanguard vs Hunter 240 — Comparison

1965 Pearson Vanguard1965 Pearson Vanguard
VS
Hunter 240Hunter 240

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1965 Pearson VanguardHunter 240
General
ManufacturerPearsonHunter
Year1965–19721999–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerPhilip RhodesGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.83 m (32.3 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)6.17 m (20.2 ft)
Beam2.84 m (9.3 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.22 m (4.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)476 kg (1,049 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area36.0 m² (388 ft²)22.5 m² (242 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP8 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)19 L (5.0 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
14.32
Hunter 240
18.62
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
41.11
Hunter 240
34.97
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
0.71
Hunter 240
0.88
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1965 Pearson Vanguard
25.31
Hunter 240
15.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1965 Pearson Vanguard and Hunter 240 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the Hunter 240 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard was penned by Philip Rhodes. The Hunter 240 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard measures 9.83m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the Hunter 240 at 7.32m (24.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is 2.51m longer than the Hunter 240. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard displaces approximately 200% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.32 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The Hunter 240, with an SA/D of 18.62 and 22.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 240 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The Hunter 240 has a comfort ratio of 15.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.88. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 35.0% for the Hunter 240, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hunter 240 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L water and 19L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 240 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1965 Pearson Vanguard offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1965 Pearson Vanguard · Hunter 240