1965 Pearson Vanguard vs 2014 Elan 400 — Comparison
1965 Pearson Vanguard
2014 Elan 400
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1965 Pearson Vanguard | 2014 Elan 400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pearson | Elan |
| Year | 1965–1972 | 2014–2018 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Slovenia |
| Designer | Philip Rhodes | Rob Humphreys |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.83 m (32.3 ft) | 12.07 m (39.6 ft) |
| LWL | 7.01 m (23.0 ft) | 10.50 m (34.4 ft) |
| Beam | 2.84 m (9.3 ft) | 3.90 m (12.8 ft) |
| Draft | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) | 2.10 m (6.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) | 8,200 kg (18,078 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) | 2,600 kg (5,732 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 36.0 m² (388 ft²) | 76.0 m² (818 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 10 HP | 30 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 38 L (10.0 gal) | 120 L (31.7 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 250 L (66.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 7 |
| Cabins | 1 | 3 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 2014 Elan 400 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 2014 Elan 400 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1965 Pearson Vanguard was penned by Philip Rhodes. The 2014 Elan 400 was designed by Rob Humphreys.
In terms of size, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard measures 9.83m (32.3ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 2014 Elan 400 at 12.07m (39.6ft) with a 3.90m beam. The 2014 Elan 400 is 2.24m longer than the 1965 Pearson Vanguard. The 2014 Elan 400 displaces approximately 101% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.32 and 36.0 m² of sail area. The 2014 Elan 400, with an SA/D of 18.99 and 76.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2014 Elan 400 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 2014 Elan 400 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1965 Pearson Vanguard and 31.7% for the 2014 Elan 400, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1965 Pearson Vanguard provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 2014 Elan 400 offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 250L water and 120L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1965 Pearson Vanguard is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2014 Elan 400 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2014 Elan 400 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1965 Pearson Vanguard · 2014 Elan 400