1967 Pearson 35 vs Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 — Comparison

1967 Pearson 35
VS
Beneteau Oceanis 30.1Beneteau Oceanis 30.1

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1967 Pearson 35Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
General
ManufacturerPearsonBeneteau
Year1967–19732019
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerWilliam ShawMarc Lombard
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)9.53 m (31.3 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)8.65 m (28.4 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)4,300 kg (9,480 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,350 kg (2,976 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area48.6 m² (523 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1967 Pearson 35
15.96
Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
16.52
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1967 Pearson 35
41.67
Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
31.40
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1967 Pearson 35
0.69
Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1967 Pearson 35
26.00
Beneteau Oceanis 30.1
18.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1967 Pearson 35 and Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1967 Pearson 35 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1967 Pearson 35 was penned by William Shaw. The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 was designed by Marc Lombard.

In terms of size, the 1967 Pearson 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 at 9.53m (31.3ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1967 Pearson 35 is 1.14m longer than the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1. The 1967 Pearson 35 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1967 Pearson 35 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.96 and 48.6 m² of sail area. The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1, with an SA/D of 16.52 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1967 Pearson 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.69). The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 has a comfort ratio of 18.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1967 Pearson 35 and 31.4% for the Beneteau Oceanis 30.1, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1967 Pearson 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 150L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1967 Pearson 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Beneteau Oceanis 30.1 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1967 Pearson 35 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1967 Pearson 35 · Beneteau Oceanis 30.1