1968 Alberg 35 vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

1968 Alberg 35
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1968 Alberg 351984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerVariousPearson
Year1968–19781984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerCarl AlbergWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area43.0 m² (463 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1968 Alberg 35
14.12
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1968 Alberg 35
41.67
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1968 Alberg 35
0.66
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1968 Alberg 35
27.81
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1968 Alberg 35 and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1968 Alberg 35 is a classic design by Various from USA, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1968 Alberg 35 was penned by Carl Alberg. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1968 Alberg 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1968 Alberg 35 is 0.31m longer than the 1984 Pearson 34.

Looking at performance, the 1968 Alberg 35 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.12 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 Pearson 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1968 Alberg 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 27.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.66). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1968 Alberg 35 and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1968 Alberg 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1968 Alberg 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 Pearson 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1968 Alberg 35 · 1984 Pearson 34