1968 Alberg 35 vs 1994 Sabre 362 — Comparison

1968 Alberg 35
VS
1994 Sabre 362

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1968 Alberg 351994 Sabre 362
General
ManufacturerVariousSabre
Year1968–19781994–2001
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerCarl AlbergJim Taylor
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)6,124 kg (13,501 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,540 kg (5,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area43.0 m² (463 ft²)54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1968 Alberg 35
14.12
1994 Sabre 362
16.39
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1968 Alberg 35
41.67
1994 Sabre 362
41.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1968 Alberg 35
0.66
1994 Sabre 362
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1968 Alberg 35
27.81
1994 Sabre 362
18.79

Detailed Comparison

The 1968 Alberg 35 and 1994 Sabre 362 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1968 Alberg 35 is a classic design by Various from USA, while the 1994 Sabre 362 is a 1990s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1968 Alberg 35 was penned by Carl Alberg. The 1994 Sabre 362 was designed by Jim Taylor.

In terms of size, the 1968 Alberg 35 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1994 Sabre 362 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1994 Sabre 362 is 0.30m longer than the 1968 Alberg 35. The 1994 Sabre 362 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1968 Alberg 35 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.12 and 43.0 m² of sail area. The 1994 Sabre 362, with an SA/D of 16.39 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 Sabre 362 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1968 Alberg 35 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 27.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.66). The 1994 Sabre 362 has a comfort ratio of 18.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1968 Alberg 35 and 41.5% for the 1994 Sabre 362, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1968 Alberg 35 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1994 Sabre 362 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1968 Alberg 35 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Sabre 362 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1968 Alberg 35 · 1994 Sabre 362