1968 Pearson 22 vs 1984 Dehler 25 — Comparison

1968 Pearson 22
VS
1984 Dehler 25

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1968 Pearson 221984 Dehler 25
General
ManufacturerPearsonDehler
Year1968–19731984–1992
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerWilliam ShawE.G. van de Stadt
Dimensions
LOA6.71 m (22.0 ft)7.50 m (24.6 ft)
LWL5.18 m (17.0 ft)6.30 m (20.7 ft)
Beam2.13 m (7.0 ft)2.50 m (8.2 ft)
Draft0.99 m (3.2 ft)1.35 m (4.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Ballast454 kg (1,001 lbs)680 kg (1,499 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area18.6 m² (200 ft²)22.5 m² (242 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine6 HP8 HP
Fuel Capacity19 L (5.0 gal)25 L (6.6 gal)
Water Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths44
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1968 Pearson 22
17.39
1984 Dehler 25
15.46
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1968 Pearson 22
40.04
1984 Dehler 25
37.78
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1968 Pearson 22
0.82
1984 Dehler 25
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1968 Pearson 22
20.02
1984 Dehler 25
18.41

Detailed Comparison

The 1968 Pearson 22 and 1984 Dehler 25 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1968 Pearson 22 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1984 Dehler 25 is a 1980s offering from Dehler from Germany. The 1968 Pearson 22 was penned by William Shaw. The 1984 Dehler 25 was designed by E.G. van de Stadt.

In terms of size, the 1968 Pearson 22 measures 6.71m (22.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.13m, compared to the 1984 Dehler 25 at 7.50m (24.6ft) with a 2.50m beam. The 1984 Dehler 25 is 0.79m longer than the 1968 Pearson 22. The 1984 Dehler 25 displaces approximately 59% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1968 Pearson 22 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.39 and 18.6 m² of sail area. The 1984 Dehler 25, with an SA/D of 15.46 and 22.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1968 Pearson 22 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1968 Pearson 22 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.82). The 1984 Dehler 25 has a comfort ratio of 18.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1968 Pearson 22 and 37.8% for the 1984 Dehler 25, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1968 Pearson 22 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 19L of fuel. The 1984 Dehler 25 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 25L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1968 Pearson 22 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1968 Pearson 22 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1968 Pearson 22 · 1984 Dehler 25