1968 Pearson 26 vs 1971 C&C 27 — Comparison

1968 Pearson 261968 Pearson 26
VS
1971 C&C 271971 C&C 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1968 Pearson 261971 C&C 27
General
ManufacturerPearsonC&C Yachts
Year1968–19751971–1975
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSACanada
DesignerWilliam ShawCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA7.92 m (26.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL6.10 m (20.0 ft)6.55 m (21.5 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)2.74 m (9.0 ft)
Draft1.14 m (3.7 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast862 kg (1,900 lbs)1,043 kg (2,299 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area27.0 m² (291 ft²)31.0 m² (334 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths45
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1968 Pearson 26
17.06
1971 C&C 27
17.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1968 Pearson 26
42.23
1971 C&C 27
41.80
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1968 Pearson 26
0.77
1971 C&C 27
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1968 Pearson 26
21.65
1971 C&C 27
20.13

Detailed Comparison

The 1968 Pearson 26 and 1971 C&C 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1968 Pearson 26 is a classic design by Pearson from USA, while the 1971 C&C 27 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1968 Pearson 26 was penned by William Shaw. The 1971 C&C 27 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1968 Pearson 26 measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1971 C&C 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.74m beam. The 1971 C&C 27 is 0.31m longer than the 1968 Pearson 26. The 1971 C&C 27 displaces approximately 22% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1968 Pearson 26 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.06 and 27.0 m² of sail area. The 1971 C&C 27, with an SA/D of 17.13 and 31.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1971 C&C 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1968 Pearson 26 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1971 C&C 27 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 42.2% for the 1968 Pearson 26 and 41.8% for the 1971 C&C 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1968 Pearson 26 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1971 C&C 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1968 Pearson 26 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1971 C&C 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1971 C&C 27 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1968 Pearson 26 · 1971 C&C 27