1970 Bristol 32 vs Catalina 250 — Comparison

1970 Bristol 321970 Bristol 32
VS
Catalina 250Catalina 250

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1970 Bristol 32Catalina 250
General
ManufacturerBristolCatalina
Year1970–19771994–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHalsey HerreshoffGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
LWL7.16 m (23.5 ft)6.78 m (22.2 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)2.59 m (8.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Ballast1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)612 kg (1,349 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.2 m² (433 ft²)24.5 m² (264 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)42 L (11.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1970 Bristol 32
14.91
Catalina 250
18.30
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1970 Bristol 32
42.00
Catalina 250
38.54
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1970 Bristol 32
0.72
Catalina 250
0.89
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1970 Bristol 32
25.96
Catalina 250
13.89

Detailed Comparison

The 1970 Bristol 32 and Catalina 250 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Bristol 32 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the Catalina 250 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1970 Bristol 32 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The Catalina 250 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1970 Bristol 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Catalina 250 at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.59m beam. The 1970 Bristol 32 is 2.13m longer than the Catalina 250. The 1970 Bristol 32 displaces approximately 186% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1970 Bristol 32 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.91 and 40.2 m² of sail area. The Catalina 250, with an SA/D of 18.30 and 24.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 250 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1970 Bristol 32 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.72). The Catalina 250 has a comfort ratio of 13.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.89. The ballast ratios are 42.0% for the 1970 Bristol 32 and 38.5% for the Catalina 250, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1970 Bristol 32 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Catalina 250 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 42L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1970 Bristol 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 250 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1970 Bristol 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1970 Bristol 32 · Catalina 250