1970 Columbia 26 Mk II vs 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 — Comparison

1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
VS
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321990 Wauquiez Centurion 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1970 Columbia 26 Mk II1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
General
ManufacturerColumbiaWauquiez
Year1970–19751990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerWilliam CrealockJean-Marie Finot
Dimensions
LOA7.92 m (26.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL6.25 m (20.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast726 kg (1,601 lbs)1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area26.2 m² (282 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)65 L (17.2 gal)
Water Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
17.33
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
38.11
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
0.79
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1970 Columbia 26 Mk II
19.58
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88

Detailed Comparison

The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II and 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II is a 1970s design by Columbia from USA, while the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s offering from Wauquiez from France. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II was penned by William Crealock. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was designed by Jean-Marie Finot.

In terms of size, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is 1.83m longer than the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 displaces approximately 136% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.33 and 26.2 m² of sail area. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II and 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 23L of fuel. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 65L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1970 Columbia 26 Mk II · 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32