1971 Columbia 28 vs Hunter 185 — Comparison

1971 Columbia 28
VS
Hunter 185Hunter 185

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1971 Columbia 28Hunter 185
General
ManufacturerColumbiaHunter
Year1971–19772000–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam CrealockHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)5.54 m (18.2 ft)
LWL6.86 m (22.5 ft)4.95 m (16.2 ft)
Beam2.74 m (9.0 ft)2.13 m (7.0 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)0.91 m (3.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)408 kg (899 lbs)
Ballast1,089 kg (2,401 lbs)82 kg (181 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.2 m² (336 ft²)13.0 m² (140 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinCenterboard
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths52
Cabins1

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1971 Columbia 28
16.26
Hunter 185
24.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1971 Columbia 28
40.01
Hunter 185
20.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1971 Columbia 28
0.79
Hunter 185
1.15
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1971 Columbia 28
20.16
Hunter 185
8.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1971 Columbia 28 and Hunter 185 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1971 Columbia 28 is a 1970s design by Columbia from USA, while the Hunter 185 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1971 Columbia 28 was penned by William Crealock. The Hunter 185 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1971 Columbia 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the Hunter 185 at 5.54m (18.2ft) with a 2.13m beam. The 1971 Columbia 28 is 2.99m longer than the Hunter 185. The 1971 Columbia 28 displaces approximately 567% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1971 Columbia 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.26 and 31.2 m² of sail area. The Hunter 185, with an SA/D of 24.03 and 13.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The Hunter 185 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1971 Columbia 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hunter 185 has a comfort ratio of 8.7 and a capsize screening value of 1.15. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1971 Columbia 28 and 20.1% for the Hunter 185, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1971 Columbia 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hunter 185 offers 2 berths with unspecified water tankage and unspecified fuel.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1971 Columbia 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 185 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1971 Columbia 28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1971 Columbia 28 · Hunter 185