1971 Columbia 28 vs 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 — Comparison

1971 Columbia 28
VS
2013 Beneteau Figaro 32013 Beneteau Figaro 3

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1971 Columbia 282013 Beneteau Figaro 3
General
ManufacturerColumbiaBeneteau
Year1971–19772013
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerWilliam CrealockVPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.10 m (33.1 ft)
LWL6.86 m (22.5 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam2.74 m (9.0 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)3,450 kg (7,606 lbs)
Ballast1,089 kg (2,401 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.2 m² (336 ft²)65.0 m² (700 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths52
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1971 Columbia 28
16.26
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
28.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1971 Columbia 28
40.01
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
43.48
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1971 Columbia 28
0.79
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
0.90
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1971 Columbia 28
20.16
2013 Beneteau Figaro 3
11.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1971 Columbia 28 and 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1971 Columbia 28 is a 1970s design by Columbia from USA, while the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is a modern offering from Beneteau from France. The 1971 Columbia 28 was penned by William Crealock. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 was designed by VPLP / Van Peteghem Lauriot-Prévost.

In terms of size, the 1971 Columbia 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.74m, compared to the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 at 10.10m (33.1ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 is 1.57m longer than the 1971 Columbia 28. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 displaces approximately 27% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1971 Columbia 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.26 and 31.2 m² of sail area. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, with an SA/D of 28.93 and 65.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1971 Columbia 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has a comfort ratio of 11.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.90. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1971 Columbia 28 and 43.5% for the 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1971 Columbia 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 offers 2 berths in 1 cabin with 40L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1971 Columbia 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1971 Columbia 28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1971 Columbia 28 · 2013 Beneteau Figaro 3