1971 Ranger 26 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison

1971 Ranger 261971 Ranger 26
VS
1972 Ranger 291972 Ranger 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1971 Ranger 261972 Ranger 29
General
ManufacturerRangerRanger
Year1971–19761972–1978
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGary MullGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA7.92 m (26.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL6.40 m (21.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam2.62 m (8.6 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area29.5 m² (318 ft²)35.0 m² (377 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1971 Ranger 26
17.85
1972 Ranger 29
16.47
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1971 Ranger 26
41.66
1972 Ranger 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1971 Ranger 26
0.81
1972 Ranger 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1971 Ranger 26
19.73
1972 Ranger 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1971 Ranger 26 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1971 Ranger 26 is a 1970s design by Ranger from USA, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1971 Ranger 26 was penned by Gary Mull. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1971 Ranger 26 measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.62m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1972 Ranger 29 is 0.92m longer than the 1971 Ranger 26. The 1972 Ranger 29 displaces approximately 46% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1971 Ranger 26 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.85 and 29.5 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1971 Ranger 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1971 Ranger 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1971 Ranger 26 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1971 Ranger 26 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 45L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Ranger 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1971 Ranger 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1972 Ranger 29 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1971 Ranger 26 · 1972 Ranger 29