1971 Ranger 26 vs Hunter 27 — Comparison

1971 Ranger 261971 Ranger 26
VS
Hunter 27Hunter 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1971 Ranger 26Hunter 27
General
ManufacturerRangerHunter
Year1971–19761992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGary MullHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA7.92 m (26.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL6.40 m (21.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam2.62 m (8.6 ft)2.79 m (9.2 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area29.5 m² (318 ft²)33.0 m² (355 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1971 Ranger 26
17.85
Hunter 27
18.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1971 Ranger 26
41.66
Hunter 27
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1971 Ranger 26
0.81
Hunter 27
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1971 Ranger 26
19.73
Hunter 27
16.96

Detailed Comparison

The 1971 Ranger 26 and Hunter 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1971 Ranger 26 is a 1970s design by Ranger from USA, while the Hunter 27 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1971 Ranger 26 was penned by Gary Mull. The Hunter 27 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1971 Ranger 26 measures 7.92m (26.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.62m, compared to the Hunter 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.79m beam. The Hunter 27 is 0.31m longer than the 1971 Ranger 26. The Hunter 27 displaces approximately 15% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1971 Ranger 26 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.85 and 29.5 m² of sail area. The Hunter 27, with an SA/D of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1971 Ranger 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The Hunter 27 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1971 Ranger 26 and 36.4% for the Hunter 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1971 Ranger 26 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 45L of water capacity and 30L of fuel. The Hunter 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1971 Ranger 26 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1971 Ranger 26 · Hunter 27