1972 Contest 31 vs 1988 Westerly Corsair — Comparison

1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31
VS
1988 Westerly Corsair1988 Westerly Corsair

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1972 Contest 311988 Westerly Corsair
General
ManufacturerContestWesterly
Year1972–19821988–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsUK
DesignerDick ZaalEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)11.00 m (36.1 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.50 m (11.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)6,350 kg (13,999 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)2,450 kg (5,401 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.5 m² (425 ft²)50.0 m² (538 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Contest 31
14.65
1988 Westerly Corsair
14.81
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Contest 31
39.99
1988 Westerly Corsair
38.58
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Contest 31
0.74
1988 Westerly Corsair
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Contest 31
23.65
1988 Westerly Corsair
19.55

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Contest 31 and 1988 Westerly Corsair represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1988 Westerly Corsair is a 1980s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1972 Contest 31 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1988 Westerly Corsair was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1972 Contest 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1988 Westerly Corsair at 11.00m (36.1ft) with a 3.50m beam. The 1988 Westerly Corsair is 1.55m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 1988 Westerly Corsair displaces approximately 40% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Contest 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of sail area. The 1988 Westerly Corsair, with an SA/D of 14.81 and 50.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1988 Westerly Corsair has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Contest 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1988 Westerly Corsair has a comfort ratio of 19.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31 and 38.6% for the 1988 Westerly Corsair, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Contest 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1988 Westerly Corsair offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 200L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 Westerly Corsair has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Westerly Corsair offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1972 Contest 31 · 1988 Westerly Corsair