1972 Contest 31 vs 1996 Najad 380 — Comparison
1972 Contest 31
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1972 Contest 31 | 1996 Najad 380 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Contest | Najad |
| Year | 1972–1982 | 1996–2006 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Netherlands | Sweden |
| Designer | Dick Zaal | Judel/Vrolijk |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) | 11.55 m (37.9 ft) |
| LWL | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 9.50 m (31.2 ft) |
| Beam | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) | 3.55 m (11.6 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.85 m (6.1 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) | 7,500 kg (16,535 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) | 3,050 kg (6,724 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 39.5 m² (425 ft²) | 62.0 m² (667 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Steel | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 80 L (21.1 gal) | 150 L (39.6 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 150 L (39.6 gal) | 260 L (68.7 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1972 Contest 31 and 1996 Najad 380 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1996 Najad 380 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1972 Contest 31 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1996 Najad 380 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.
In terms of size, the 1972 Contest 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1996 Najad 380 at 11.55m (37.9ft) with a 3.55m beam. The 1996 Najad 380 is 2.10m longer than the 1972 Contest 31. The 1996 Najad 380 displaces approximately 65% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1972 Contest 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of sail area. The 1996 Najad 380, with an SA/D of 16.44 and 62.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1996 Najad 380 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1972 Contest 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1996 Najad 380 has a comfort ratio of 20.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31 and 40.7% for the 1996 Najad 380, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1972 Contest 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1996 Najad 380 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 260L water and 150L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1996 Najad 380 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1996 Najad 380 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1972 Contest 31 · 1996 Najad 380