1972 Contest 31 vs 1998 Dehler 29 — Comparison

1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31
VS
1998 Dehler 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1972 Contest 311998 Dehler 29
General
ManufacturerContestDehler
Year1972–19821998–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryNetherlandsGermany
DesignerDick ZaalJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)8.82 m (28.9 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)7.60 m (24.9 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.95 m (9.7 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.55 m (5.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)3,200 kg (7,055 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.5 m² (425 ft²)35.0 m² (377 ft²)
Hull MaterialSteelFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP14 HP
Fuel Capacity80 L (21.1 gal)40 L (10.6 gal)
Water Capacity150 L (39.6 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Contest 31
14.65
1998 Dehler 29
16.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Contest 31
39.99
1998 Dehler 29
37.50
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Contest 31
0.74
1998 Dehler 29
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Contest 31
23.65
1998 Dehler 29
18.34

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Contest 31 and 1998 Dehler 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s design by Contest from Netherlands, while the 1998 Dehler 29 is a 1990s offering from Dehler from Germany. The 1972 Contest 31 was penned by Dick Zaal. The 1998 Dehler 29 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1972 Contest 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1998 Dehler 29 at 8.82m (28.9ft) with a 2.95m beam. The 1972 Contest 31 is 0.63m longer than the 1998 Dehler 29. The 1972 Contest 31 displaces approximately 42% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Contest 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of sail area. The 1998 Dehler 29, with an SA/D of 16.38 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1998 Dehler 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Contest 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1998 Dehler 29 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31 and 37.5% for the 1998 Dehler 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Contest 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L of water capacity and 80L of fuel. The 1998 Dehler 29 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 80L water and 40L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1998 Dehler 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1972 Contest 31 · 1998 Dehler 29