1972 Morgan 30 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

1972 Morgan 30
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1972 Morgan 301973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerMorganRanger
Year1972–19771973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerCharley MorganGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL7.16 m (23.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area37.2 m² (400 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Morgan 30
15.37
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Morgan 30
38.82
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Morgan 30
0.76
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Morgan 30
23.12
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Morgan 30 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Morgan 30 is a 1970s design by Morgan from USA, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1972 Morgan 30 was penned by Charley Morgan. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1972 Morgan 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1973 Ranger 33 is 0.92m longer than the 1972 Morgan 30. The 1973 Ranger 33 displaces approximately 24% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Morgan 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.37 and 37.2 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1973 Ranger 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Morgan 30 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 38.8% for the 1972 Morgan 30 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Morgan 30 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Morgan 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1973 Ranger 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1972 Morgan 30 · 1973 Ranger 33