1972 Morgan 30 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison

1972 Morgan 30
VS
Hunter 30Hunter 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1972 Morgan 30Hunter 30
General
ManufacturerMorganHunter
Year1972–19771991–1996
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerCharley MorganHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL7.16 m (23.5 ft)7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area37.2 m² (400 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1972 Morgan 30
15.37
Hunter 30
16.94
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1972 Morgan 30
38.82
Hunter 30
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1972 Morgan 30
0.76
Hunter 30
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1972 Morgan 30
23.12
Hunter 30
19.54

Detailed Comparison

The 1972 Morgan 30 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1972 Morgan 30 is a 1970s design by Morgan from USA, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1972 Morgan 30 was penned by Charley Morgan. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1972 Morgan 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam.

Looking at performance, the 1972 Morgan 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.37 and 37.2 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1972 Morgan 30 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 23.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 38.8% for the 1972 Morgan 30 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1972 Morgan 30 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Morgan 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1972 Morgan 30 · Hunter 30