1974 C&C 35 Mk II vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

1974 C&C 35 Mk II
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1974 C&C 35 Mk II1973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsRanger
Year1974–19791973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
17.26
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
43.48
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
0.75
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
20.76
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is 0.61m longer than the 1973 Ranger 33. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II displaces approximately 10% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1974 C&C 35 Mk II · 1973 Ranger 33