1974 C&C 35 Mk II vs 1990 Feeling 32 — Comparison

1974 C&C 35 Mk II
VS
1990 Feeling 321990 Feeling 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1974 C&C 35 Mk II1990 Feeling 32
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsFeeling
Year1974–19791990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaFrance
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianPhilippe Harlé
Dimensions
LOA10.67 m (35.0 ft)9.85 m (32.3 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)8.20 m (26.9 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)4,700 kg (10,362 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
17.26
1990 Feeling 32
14.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
43.48
1990 Feeling 32
36.17
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
0.75
1990 Feeling 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1974 C&C 35 Mk II
20.76
1990 Feeling 32
20.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 1990 Feeling 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1990 Feeling 32 is a 1990s offering from Feeling from France. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1990 Feeling 32 was designed by Philippe Harlé.

In terms of size, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the 1990 Feeling 32 at 9.85m (32.3ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is 0.82m longer than the 1990 Feeling 32. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II displaces approximately 11% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The 1990 Feeling 32, with an SA/D of 14.49 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1990 Feeling 32 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II and 36.2% for the 1990 Feeling 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1974 C&C 35 Mk II provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1990 Feeling 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1974 C&C 35 Mk II offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1974 C&C 35 Mk II · 1990 Feeling 32