1974 Catalina 22 vs Hunter 280 — Comparison

1974 Catalina 221974 Catalina 22
VS
Hunter 280Hunter 280

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1974 Catalina 22Hunter 280
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHunter
Year1974–20121998–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerFrank ButlerGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA6.71 m (22.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL5.79 m (19.0 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam2.24 m (7.3 ft)2.82 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement862 kg (1,900 lbs)2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)
Ballast363 kg (800 lbs)998 kg (2,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area18.4 m² (198 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine6 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity15 L (4.0 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity20 L (5.3 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths45
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1974 Catalina 22
20.65
Hunter 280
18.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1974 Catalina 22
42.11
Hunter 280
38.61
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1974 Catalina 22
0.94
Hunter 280
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1974 Catalina 22
12.30
Hunter 280
16.46

Detailed Comparison

The 1974 Catalina 22 and Hunter 280 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1974 Catalina 22 is a 1970s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hunter 280 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1974 Catalina 22 was penned by Frank Butler. The Hunter 280 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1974 Catalina 22 measures 6.71m (22.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.24m, compared to the Hunter 280 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.82m beam. The Hunter 280 is 1.82m longer than the 1974 Catalina 22. The Hunter 280 displaces approximately 200% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1974 Catalina 22 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.65 and 18.4 m² of sail area. The Hunter 280, with an SA/D of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1974 Catalina 22 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1974 Catalina 22 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 12.3) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.94). The Hunter 280 has a comfort ratio of 16.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 42.1% for the 1974 Catalina 22 and 38.6% for the Hunter 280, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1974 Catalina 22 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 20L of water capacity and 15L of fuel. The Hunter 280 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 280 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1974 Catalina 22 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 280 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1974 Catalina 22 · Hunter 280