1974 O'Day 23 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1974 O'Day 231974 O'Day 23
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1974 O'Day 231983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerO'DayIrwin
Year1974–19831983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerC. Raymond HuntTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA6.93 m (22.7 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL5.79 m (19.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam2.24 m (7.3 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.02 m (3.3 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement816 kg (1,799 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast295 kg (650 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area17.5 m² (188 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine5 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity11 L (2.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity15 L (4.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1974 O'Day 23
20.38
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1974 O'Day 23
36.15
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1974 O'Day 23
0.96
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1974 O'Day 23
11.39
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1974 O'Day 23 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1974 O'Day 23 is a 1970s design by O'Day from USA, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1974 O'Day 23 was penned by C. Raymond Hunt. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1974 O'Day 23 measures 6.93m (22.7ft) overall with a beam of 2.24m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1983 Irwin 32 is 2.82m longer than the 1974 O'Day 23. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 512% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1974 O'Day 23 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 20.38 and 17.5 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1974 O'Day 23 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1974 O'Day 23 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 11.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.96). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 36.2% for the 1974 O'Day 23 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1974 O'Day 23 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 15L of water capacity and 11L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1974 O'Day 23 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Irwin 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1974 O'Day 23 · 1983 Irwin 32