1974 Tartan 27 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

1974 Tartan 271974 Tartan 27
VS
1983 Pearson 311983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1974 Tartan 271983 Pearson 31
General
ManufacturerTartanPearson
Year1974–19801983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerSparkman & StephensWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL6.40 m (21.0 ft)7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam2.69 m (8.8 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area33.5 m² (361 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1974 Tartan 27
16.56
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1974 Tartan 27
46.17
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1974 Tartan 27
0.75
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1974 Tartan 27
25.11
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1974 Tartan 27 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1974 Tartan 27 is a 1970s design by Tartan from USA, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1974 Tartan 27 was penned by Sparkman & Stephens. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1974 Tartan 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.69m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1983 Pearson 31 is 1.22m longer than the 1974 Tartan 27. The 1983 Pearson 31 displaces approximately 46% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1974 Tartan 27 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.56 and 33.5 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1974 Tartan 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1974 Tartan 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 46.2% for the 1974 Tartan 27 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1974 Tartan 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1974 Tartan 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1974 Tartan 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Pearson 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1974 Tartan 27 · 1983 Pearson 31