1976 Newport 27 vs 1972 Contest 31 — Comparison

1976 Newport 271976 Newport 27
VS
1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1976 Newport 271972 Contest 31
General
ManufacturerCapital YachtsContest
Year1976–19841972–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSANetherlands
DesignerGary MullDick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,043 kg (2,299 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area29.1 m² (313 ft²)39.5 m² (425 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassSteel
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1976 Newport 27
16.08
1972 Contest 31
14.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1976 Newport 27
41.80
1972 Contest 31
39.99
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1976 Newport 27
0.76
1972 Contest 31
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1976 Newport 27
21.02
1972 Contest 31
23.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1976 Newport 27 and 1972 Contest 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1976 Newport 27 is a 1970s design by Capital Yachts from USA, while the 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 1976 Newport 27 was penned by Gary Mull. The 1972 Contest 31 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the 1976 Newport 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1972 Contest 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1972 Contest 31 is 1.22m longer than the 1976 Newport 27. The 1972 Contest 31 displaces approximately 82% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1976 Newport 27 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.08 and 29.1 m² of sail area. The 1972 Contest 31, with an SA/D of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1976 Newport 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1976 Newport 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1972 Contest 31 has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.8% for the 1976 Newport 27 and 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1976 Newport 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1972 Contest 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1976 Newport 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1976 Newport 27 · 1972 Contest 31