1976 Newport 27 vs Hunter 33 — Comparison

1976 Newport 271976 Newport 27
VS
Hunter 33Hunter 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1976 Newport 27Hunter 33
General
ManufacturerCapital YachtsHunter
Year1976–19841988–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerGary MullHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast1,043 kg (2,299 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area29.1 m² (313 ft²)48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1976 Newport 27
16.08
Hunter 33
17.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1976 Newport 27
41.80
Hunter 33
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1976 Newport 27
0.76
Hunter 33
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1976 Newport 27
21.02
Hunter 33
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1976 Newport 27 and Hunter 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1976 Newport 27 is a 1970s design by Capital Yachts from USA, while the Hunter 33 is a 1980s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1976 Newport 27 was penned by Gary Mull. The Hunter 33 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1976 Newport 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the Hunter 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Hunter 33 is 1.83m longer than the 1976 Newport 27. The Hunter 33 displaces approximately 91% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1976 Newport 27 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.08 and 29.1 m² of sail area. The Hunter 33, with an SA/D of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1976 Newport 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 41.8% for the 1976 Newport 27 and 38.1% for the Hunter 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1976 Newport 27 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hunter 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 Newport 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1976 Newport 27 · Hunter 33