1977 Bristol 29.9 vs Hunter 27 — Comparison

1977 Bristol 29.9
VS
Hunter 27Hunter 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1977 Bristol 29.9Hunter 27
General
ManufacturerBristolHunter
Year1977–19841992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerHalsey HerreshoffHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA9.12 m (29.9 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL7.32 m (24.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam2.97 m (9.7 ft)2.79 m (9.2 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.7 m² (427 ft²)33.0 m² (355 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1977 Bristol 29.9
16.41
Hunter 27
18.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1977 Bristol 29.9
41.18
Hunter 27
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1977 Bristol 29.9
0.76
Hunter 27
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1977 Bristol 29.9
22.50
Hunter 27
16.96

Detailed Comparison

The 1977 Bristol 29.9 and Hunter 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1977 Bristol 29.9 is a 1970s design by Bristol from USA, while the Hunter 27 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1977 Bristol 29.9 was penned by Halsey Herreshoff. The Hunter 27 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1977 Bristol 29.9 measures 9.12m (29.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.97m, compared to the Hunter 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.79m beam. The 1977 Bristol 29.9 is 0.89m longer than the Hunter 27. The 1977 Bristol 29.9 displaces approximately 55% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1977 Bristol 29.9 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.41 and 39.7 m² of sail area. The Hunter 27, with an SA/D of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1977 Bristol 29.9 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 27 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1977 Bristol 29.9 and 36.4% for the Hunter 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1977 Bristol 29.9 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1977 Bristol 29.9 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1977 Bristol 29.9 · Hunter 27