1977 Cape Dory 22 vs 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 — Comparison

1977 Cape Dory 22
VS
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1977 Cape Dory 221988 Pacific Seacraft 31
General
ManufacturerCape DoryPacific Seacraft
Year1977–19831988–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerCarl AlbergWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA6.71 m (22.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL5.18 m (17.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam2.13 m (7.0 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft0.91 m (3.0 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,089 kg (2,401 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast454 kg (1,001 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area18.2 m² (196 ft²)40.5 m² (436 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine7 HP25 HP
Fuel Capacity19 L (5.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths45
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1977 Cape Dory 22
17.48
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1977 Cape Dory 22
41.69
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1977 Cape Dory 22
0.83
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1977 Cape Dory 22
19.23
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1977 Cape Dory 22 and 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1977 Cape Dory 22 is a 1970s design by Cape Dory from USA, while the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1977 Cape Dory 22 was penned by Carl Alberg. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1977 Cape Dory 22 measures 6.71m (22.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.13m, compared to the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is 2.74m longer than the 1977 Cape Dory 22. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 displaces approximately 358% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1977 Cape Dory 22 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.48 and 18.2 m² of sail area. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, with an SA/D of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1977 Cape Dory 22 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1977 Cape Dory 22 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.83). The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has a comfort ratio of 26.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1977 Cape Dory 22 and 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1977 Cape Dory 22 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 19L of fuel. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1977 Cape Dory 22 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1977 Cape Dory 22 · 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31