1978 Catalina 25 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1978 Catalina 251978 Catalina 25
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Catalina 251983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerCatalinaIrwin
Year1978–19911983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerFrank ButlerTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL6.40 m (21.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,905 kg (4,200 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast748 kg (1,649 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area26.1 m² (281 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Catalina 25
17.26
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Catalina 25
39.27
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Catalina 25
0.79
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Catalina 25
19.50
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Catalina 25 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Catalina 25 is a 1970s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1978 Catalina 25 was penned by Frank Butler. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1978 Catalina 25 measures 7.62m (25.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1983 Irwin 32 is 2.13m longer than the 1978 Catalina 25. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 162% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Catalina 25 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 26.1 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1978 Catalina 25 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Catalina 25 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.5) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 39.3% for the 1978 Catalina 25 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Catalina 25 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 Catalina 25 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Irwin 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Catalina 25 · 1983 Irwin 32