1978 C&C 24 vs 1972 Ranger 29 — Comparison
1978 C&C 24
1972 Ranger 29
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1978 C&C 24 | 1972 Ranger 29 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | C&C Yachts | Ranger |
| Year | 1978–1983 | 1972–1978 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Canada | USA |
| Designer | Cuthbertson & Cassian | Gary Mull |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) | 8.84 m (29.0 ft) |
| LWL | 6.10 m (20.0 ft) | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) |
| Beam | 2.44 m (8.0 ft) | 2.84 m (9.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.22 m (4.0 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 1,497 kg (3,300 lbs) | 3,175 kg (7,000 lbs) |
| Ballast | 612 kg (1,349 lbs) | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 24.0 m² (258 ft²) | 35.0 m² (377 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 7 HP | 13 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 19 L (5.0 gal) | 45 L (11.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 30 L (7.9 gal) | 76 L (20.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 4 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1978 C&C 24 and 1972 Ranger 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 C&C 24 is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1972 Ranger 29 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1978 C&C 24 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1972 Ranger 29 was designed by Gary Mull.
In terms of size, the 1978 C&C 24 measures 7.32m (24.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1972 Ranger 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1972 Ranger 29 is 1.52m longer than the 1978 C&C 24. The 1972 Ranger 29 displaces approximately 112% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1978 C&C 24 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.64 and 24.0 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ranger 29, with an SA/D of 16.47 and 35.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1978 C&C 24 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1978 C&C 24 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The 1972 Ranger 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 1978 C&C 24 and 42.9% for the 1972 Ranger 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1978 C&C 24 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L of water capacity and 19L of fuel. The 1972 Ranger 29 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1972 Ranger 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1978 C&C 24 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1972 Ranger 29 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1978 C&C 24 · 1972 Ranger 29