1978 C&C 24 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison

1978 C&C 241978 C&C 24
VS
1983 Pearson 311983 Pearson 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 C&C 241983 Pearson 31
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsPearson
Year1978–19831983–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA7.32 m (24.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL6.10 m (20.0 ft)7.77 m (25.5 ft)
Beam2.44 m (8.0 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)4,309 kg (9,500 lbs)
Ballast612 kg (1,349 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area24.0 m² (258 ft²)40.0 m² (431 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine7 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity19 L (5.0 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity30 L (7.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 C&C 24
18.64
1983 Pearson 31
15.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 C&C 24
40.88
1983 Pearson 31
42.10
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 C&C 24
0.85
1983 Pearson 31
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 C&C 24
16.77
1983 Pearson 31
21.43

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 C&C 24 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 C&C 24 is a 1970s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1978 C&C 24 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1978 C&C 24 measures 7.32m (24.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.44m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1983 Pearson 31 is 2.13m longer than the 1978 C&C 24. The 1983 Pearson 31 displaces approximately 188% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 C&C 24 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.64 and 24.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1978 C&C 24 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 C&C 24 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.9% for the 1978 C&C 24 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 C&C 24 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 30L of water capacity and 19L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 C&C 24 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Pearson 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 C&C 24 · 1983 Pearson 31