1978 Pearson 30 vs 1976 Ericson 29 — Comparison

1978 Pearson 301978 Pearson 30
VS
1976 Ericson 291976 Ericson 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Pearson 301976 Ericson 29
General
ManufacturerPearsonEricson
Year1978–19831976–1983
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam ShawBruce King
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.3 m² (423 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Pearson 30
16.91
1976 Ericson 29
15.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Pearson 30
41.25
1976 Ericson 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Pearson 30
0.79
1976 Ericson 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Pearson 30
19.87
1976 Ericson 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Pearson 30 and 1976 Ericson 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Pearson 30 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1976 Ericson 29 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1978 Pearson 30 was penned by William Shaw. The 1976 Ericson 29 was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the 1978 Pearson 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1976 Ericson 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1978 Pearson 30 is 0.30m longer than the 1976 Ericson 29. The 1978 Pearson 30 displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Pearson 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.91 and 39.3 m² of sail area. The 1976 Ericson 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1978 Pearson 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Pearson 30 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1976 Ericson 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 41.3% for the 1978 Pearson 30 and 42.9% for the 1976 Ericson 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Pearson 30 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1976 Ericson 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 Ericson 29 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 Pearson 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1978 Pearson 30 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Pearson 30 · 1976 Ericson 29