1978 Pearson 30 vs 1986 Island Packet 27 — Comparison

1978 Pearson 301978 Pearson 30
VS
1986 Island Packet 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Pearson 301986 Island Packet 27
General
ManufacturerPearsonIsland Packet
Year1978–19831986–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam ShawBob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)7.01 m (23.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.90 m (9.5 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)1,270 kg (2,800 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.3 m² (423 ft²)29.0 m² (312 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Pearson 30
16.91
1986 Island Packet 27
13.64
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Pearson 30
41.25
1986 Island Packet 27
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Pearson 30
0.79
1986 Island Packet 27
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Pearson 30
19.87
1986 Island Packet 27
21.72

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Pearson 30 and 1986 Island Packet 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Pearson 30 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1986 Island Packet 27 is a 1980s offering from Island Packet from USA. The 1978 Pearson 30 was penned by William Shaw. The 1986 Island Packet 27 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the 1978 Pearson 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1986 Island Packet 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.90m beam. The 1978 Pearson 30 is 0.91m longer than the 1986 Island Packet 27. The 1978 Pearson 30 displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Pearson 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.91 and 39.3 m² of sail area. The 1986 Island Packet 27, with an SA/D of 13.64 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1978 Pearson 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Pearson 30 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1986 Island Packet 27 has a comfort ratio of 21.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 41.3% for the 1978 Pearson 30 and 40.0% for the 1986 Island Packet 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Pearson 30 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1986 Island Packet 27 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Island Packet 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 Pearson 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1978 Pearson 30 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Pearson 30 · 1986 Island Packet 27