1978 Pearson 30 vs 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 — Comparison

1978 Pearson 301978 Pearson 30
VS
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321990 Wauquiez Centurion 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Pearson 301990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
General
ManufacturerPearsonWauquiez
Year1978–19831990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerWilliam ShawJean-Marie Finot
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.3 m² (423 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)65 L (17.2 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Pearson 30
16.91
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Pearson 30
41.25
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Pearson 30
0.79
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Pearson 30
19.87
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Pearson 30 and 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Pearson 30 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s offering from Wauquiez from France. The 1978 Pearson 30 was penned by William Shaw. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was designed by Jean-Marie Finot.

In terms of size, the 1978 Pearson 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is 0.61m longer than the 1978 Pearson 30. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 displaces approximately 24% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Pearson 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.91 and 39.3 m² of sail area. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1978 Pearson 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Pearson 30 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.3% for the 1978 Pearson 30 and 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Pearson 30 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 65L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 Pearson 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1978 Pearson 30 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Pearson 30 · 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32