1978 Pearson 30 vs Catalina 250 — Comparison

1978 Pearson 301978 Pearson 30
VS
Catalina 250Catalina 250

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1978 Pearson 30Catalina 250
General
ManufacturerPearsonCatalina
Year1978–19831994–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam ShawGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
LWL7.47 m (24.5 ft)6.78 m (22.2 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.59 m (8.5 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Ballast1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)612 kg (1,349 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.3 m² (423 ft²)24.5 m² (264 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)42 L (11.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1978 Pearson 30
16.91
Catalina 250
18.30
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1978 Pearson 30
41.25
Catalina 250
38.54
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1978 Pearson 30
0.79
Catalina 250
0.89
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1978 Pearson 30
19.87
Catalina 250
13.89

Detailed Comparison

The 1978 Pearson 30 and Catalina 250 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1978 Pearson 30 is a 1970s design by Pearson from USA, while the Catalina 250 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1978 Pearson 30 was penned by William Shaw. The Catalina 250 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1978 Pearson 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Catalina 250 at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.59m beam. The 1978 Pearson 30 is 1.52m longer than the Catalina 250. The 1978 Pearson 30 displaces approximately 129% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1978 Pearson 30 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.91 and 39.3 m² of sail area. The Catalina 250, with an SA/D of 18.30 and 24.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 250 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1978 Pearson 30 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.9) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Catalina 250 has a comfort ratio of 13.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.89. The ballast ratios are 41.3% for the 1978 Pearson 30 and 38.5% for the Catalina 250, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1978 Pearson 30 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Catalina 250 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 42L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Pearson 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 250 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1978 Pearson 30 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1978 Pearson 30 · Catalina 250