1979 O'Day 28 vs 1973 Ranger 33 — Comparison

1979 O'Day 281979 O'Day 28
VS
1973 Ranger 331973 Ranger 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1979 O'Day 281973 Ranger 33
General
ManufacturerO'DayRanger
Year1979–19851973–1979
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerC. Raymond HuntGary Mull
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam2.84 m (9.3 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast1,089 kg (2,401 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.0 m² (334 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1979 O'Day 28
16.16
1973 Ranger 33
15.43
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1979 O'Day 28
40.01
1973 Ranger 33
42.85
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1979 O'Day 28
0.81
1973 Ranger 33
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1979 O'Day 28
18.69
1973 Ranger 33
21.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1979 O'Day 28 and 1973 Ranger 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1979 O'Day 28 is a 1970s design by O'Day from USA, while the 1973 Ranger 33 is a 1970s offering from Ranger from USA. The 1979 O'Day 28 was penned by C. Raymond Hunt. The 1973 Ranger 33 was designed by Gary Mull.

In terms of size, the 1979 O'Day 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 1973 Ranger 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1973 Ranger 33 is 1.53m longer than the 1979 O'Day 28. The 1973 Ranger 33 displaces approximately 75% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1979 O'Day 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.16 and 31.0 m² of sail area. The 1973 Ranger 33, with an SA/D of 15.43 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1979 O'Day 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1979 O'Day 28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.81). The 1973 Ranger 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1979 O'Day 28 and 42.9% for the 1973 Ranger 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1979 O'Day 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1973 Ranger 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1973 Ranger 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1979 O'Day 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1973 Ranger 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1979 O'Day 28 · 1973 Ranger 33