1980 CS 33 vs Hanse 415 — Comparison

1980 CS 33
VS
Hanse 415

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 CS 33Hanse 415
General
ManufacturerCS YachtsHanse
Year1980–19872011–2017
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaGermany
DesignerRay Walljudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA10.06 m (33.0 ft)12.40 m (40.7 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)10.90 m (35.8 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.96 m (13.0 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)2.10 m (6.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)8,500 kg (18,739 lbs)
Ballast2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)2,650 kg (5,842 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area49.1 m² (529 ft²)73.0 m² (786 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP40 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)310 L (81.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths68
Cabins23

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 CS 33
17.62
Hanse 415
17.81
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 CS 33
42.85
Hanse 415
31.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 CS 33
0.76
Hanse 415
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 CS 33
20.17
Hanse 415
16.21

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 CS 33 and Hanse 415 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 CS 33 is a 1980s design by CS Yachts from Canada, while the Hanse 415 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1980 CS 33 was penned by Ray Wall. The Hanse 415 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1980 CS 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the Hanse 415 at 12.40m (40.7ft) with a 3.96m beam. The Hanse 415 is 2.34m longer than the 1980 CS 33. The Hanse 415 displaces approximately 78% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 CS 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.62 and 49.1 m² of sail area. The Hanse 415, with an SA/D of 17.81 and 73.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 415 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 CS 33 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hanse 415 has a comfort ratio of 16.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 42.9% for the 1980 CS 33 and 31.2% for the Hanse 415, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 CS 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hanse 415 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 310L water and 170L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1980 CS 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 415 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 415 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 CS 33 · Hanse 415