1980 Peterson 34 vs 1979 Westerly Fulmar — Comparison

1980 Peterson 34
VS
1979 Westerly Fulmar1979 Westerly Fulmar

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1980 Peterson 341979 Westerly Fulmar
General
ManufacturerPetersonWesterly
Year1980–19861979–1986
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerDoug PetersonEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL8.53 m (28.0 ft)8.00 m (26.2 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area51.1 m² (550 ft²)36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinBilge
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)136 L (35.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1980 Peterson 34
17.26
1979 Westerly Fulmar
12.53
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1980 Peterson 34
43.48
1979 Westerly Fulmar
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1980 Peterson 34
0.76
1979 Westerly Fulmar
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1980 Peterson 34
19.98
1979 Westerly Fulmar
22.41

Detailed Comparison

The 1980 Peterson 34 and 1979 Westerly Fulmar represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1980 Peterson 34 is a 1980s design by Peterson from USA, while the 1979 Westerly Fulmar is a 1970s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1980 Peterson 34 was penned by Doug Peterson. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1980 Peterson 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1979 Westerly Fulmar at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1980 Peterson 34 is 0.61m longer than the 1979 Westerly Fulmar. The 1980 Peterson 34 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1980 Peterson 34 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.26 and 51.1 m² of sail area. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar, with an SA/D of 12.53 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1980 Peterson 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1980 Peterson 34 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1979 Westerly Fulmar has a comfort ratio of 22.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 43.5% for the 1980 Peterson 34 and 36.4% for the 1979 Westerly Fulmar, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1980 Peterson 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1979 Westerly Fulmar offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 136L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1979 Westerly Fulmar is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1980 Peterson 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1980 Peterson 34 · 1979 Westerly Fulmar