1981 Ericson 30+ vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

1981 Ericson 30+
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Ericson 30+1984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerEricsonPearson
Year1981–19861984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBruce KingWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.7 m² (427 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Ericson 30+
15.79
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Ericson 30+
41.11
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Ericson 30+
0.76
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Ericson 30+
21.78
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Ericson 30+ and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Ericson 30+ is a 1980s design by Ericson from USA, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1981 Ericson 30+ was penned by Bruce King. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1981 Ericson 30+ measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1984 Pearson 34 is 1.22m longer than the 1981 Ericson 30+. The 1984 Pearson 34 displaces approximately 33% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Ericson 30+ has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.79 and 39.7 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1981 Ericson 30+ has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Ericson 30+ offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1981 Ericson 30+ and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Ericson 30+ provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Ericson 30+ is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1981 Ericson 30+ has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Ericson 30+ · 1984 Pearson 34