1981 Ericson 30+ vs Hunter 280 — Comparison

1981 Ericson 30+
VS
Hunter 280Hunter 280

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Ericson 30+Hunter 280
General
ManufacturerEricsonHunter
Year1981–19861998–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBruce KingGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.82 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)998 kg (2,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.7 m² (427 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Ericson 30+
15.79
Hunter 280
18.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Ericson 30+
41.11
Hunter 280
38.61
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Ericson 30+
0.76
Hunter 280
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Ericson 30+
21.78
Hunter 280
16.46

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Ericson 30+ and Hunter 280 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Ericson 30+ is a 1980s design by Ericson from USA, while the Hunter 280 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1981 Ericson 30+ was penned by Bruce King. The Hunter 280 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1981 Ericson 30+ measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hunter 280 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.82m beam. The 1981 Ericson 30+ is 0.61m longer than the Hunter 280. The 1981 Ericson 30+ displaces approximately 58% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Ericson 30+ has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.79 and 39.7 m² of sail area. The Hunter 280, with an SA/D of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 280 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Ericson 30+ offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 280 has a comfort ratio of 16.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1981 Ericson 30+ and 38.6% for the Hunter 280, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Ericson 30+ provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 280 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Ericson 30+ is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 280 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1981 Ericson 30+ offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Ericson 30+ · Hunter 280