1981 Ericson 30+ vs Hunter 356 — Comparison

1981 Ericson 30+
VS
Hunter 356Hunter 356

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Ericson 30+Hunter 356
General
ManufacturerEricsonHunter
Year1981–19862000–2005
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBruce KingGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.82 m (35.5 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.53 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.7 m² (427 ft²)53.0 m² (571 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Ericson 30+
15.79
Hunter 356
17.40
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Ericson 30+
41.11
Hunter 356
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Ericson 30+
0.76
Hunter 356
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Ericson 30+
21.78
Hunter 356
16.38

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Ericson 30+ and Hunter 356 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Ericson 30+ is a 1980s design by Ericson from USA, while the Hunter 356 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1981 Ericson 30+ was penned by Bruce King. The Hunter 356 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1981 Ericson 30+ measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hunter 356 at 10.82m (35.5ft) with a 3.53m beam. The Hunter 356 is 1.68m longer than the 1981 Ericson 30+. The Hunter 356 displaces approximately 33% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Ericson 30+ has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.79 and 39.7 m² of sail area. The Hunter 356, with an SA/D of 17.40 and 53.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 356 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Ericson 30+ offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 356 has a comfort ratio of 16.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1981 Ericson 30+ and 40.0% for the Hunter 356, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Ericson 30+ provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 356 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Ericson 30+ is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 356 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Ericson 30+ · Hunter 356