1981 Ericson 30+ vs 2000 Najad 355 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1981 Ericson 30+ | 2000 Najad 355 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Ericson | Najad |
| Year | 1981–1986 | 2000–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Sweden |
| Designer | Bruce King | Judel/Vrolijk |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) | 10.72 m (35.2 ft) |
| LWL | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) |
| Beam | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) | 3.38 m (11.1 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.75 m (5.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,082 kg (8,999 lbs) | 6,000 kg (13,228 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,678 kg (3,699 lbs) | 2,400 kg (5,291 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 39.7 m² (427 ft²) | 51.0 m² (549 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 28 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 110 L (29.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 180 L (47.6 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1981 Ericson 30+ and 2000 Najad 355 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Ericson 30+ is a 1980s design by Ericson from USA, while the 2000 Najad 355 is a 2000s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1981 Ericson 30+ was penned by Bruce King. The 2000 Najad 355 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.
In terms of size, the 1981 Ericson 30+ measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 2000 Najad 355 at 10.72m (35.2ft) with a 3.38m beam. The 2000 Najad 355 is 1.58m longer than the 1981 Ericson 30+. The 2000 Najad 355 displaces approximately 47% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1981 Ericson 30+ has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.79 and 39.7 m² of sail area. The 2000 Najad 355, with an SA/D of 15.69 and 51.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1981 Ericson 30+ has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1981 Ericson 30+ offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2000 Najad 355 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1981 Ericson 30+ and 40.0% for the 2000 Najad 355, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1981 Ericson 30+ provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2000 Najad 355 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 110L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1981 Ericson 30+ is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1981 Ericson 30+ has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1981 Ericson 30+ · 2000 Najad 355