1981 Ericson 30+ vs Hunter 212 — Comparison

1981 Ericson 30+
VS
Hunter 212Hunter 212

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Ericson 30+Hunter 212
General
ManufacturerEricsonHunter
Year1981–19862003–2008
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBruce KingGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)6.35 m (20.8 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)5.56 m (18.2 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.26 m (7.4 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)0.99 m (3.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)680 kg (1,499 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)168 kg (370 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.7 m² (427 ft²)16.0 m² (172 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinCenterboard
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP4 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)15 L (4.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths63
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Ericson 30+
15.79
Hunter 212
21.04
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Ericson 30+
41.11
Hunter 212
24.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Ericson 30+
0.76
Hunter 212
1.03
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Ericson 30+
21.78
Hunter 212
10.50

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Ericson 30+ and Hunter 212 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Ericson 30+ is a 1980s design by Ericson from USA, while the Hunter 212 is a 2000s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1981 Ericson 30+ was penned by Bruce King. The Hunter 212 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1981 Ericson 30+ measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hunter 212 at 6.35m (20.8ft) with a 2.26m beam. The 1981 Ericson 30+ is 2.79m longer than the Hunter 212. The 1981 Ericson 30+ displaces approximately 500% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Ericson 30+ has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.79 and 39.7 m² of sail area. The Hunter 212, with an SA/D of 21.04 and 16.0 m² of canvas, offers generous sail power for spirited sailing. The Hunter 212 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Ericson 30+ offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The Hunter 212 has a comfort ratio of 10.5 and a capsize screening value of 1.03. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1981 Ericson 30+ and 24.7% for the Hunter 212, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Ericson 30+ provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Hunter 212 offers 3 berths in 1 cabin with 15L water and unspecified fuel.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Ericson 30+ is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 212 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1981 Ericson 30+ offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Ericson 30+ · Hunter 212