1981 Ericson 30+ vs 2013 Elan 350 — Comparison

1981 Ericson 30+
VS
2013 Elan 350

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Ericson 30+2013 Elan 350
General
ManufacturerEricsonElan
Year1981–19862013–2018
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerBruce KingRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.67 m (35.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.30 m (30.5 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.46 m (11.4 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)2.00 m (6.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)6,100 kg (13,448 lbs)
Ballast1,678 kg (3,699 lbs)1,850 kg (4,079 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.7 m² (427 ft²)58.0 m² (624 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Ericson 30+
15.79
2013 Elan 350
17.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Ericson 30+
41.11
2013 Elan 350
30.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Ericson 30+
0.76
2013 Elan 350
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Ericson 30+
21.78
2013 Elan 350
19.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Ericson 30+ and 2013 Elan 350 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Ericson 30+ is a 1980s design by Ericson from USA, while the 2013 Elan 350 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1981 Ericson 30+ was penned by Bruce King. The 2013 Elan 350 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1981 Ericson 30+ measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 2013 Elan 350 at 10.67m (35.0ft) with a 3.46m beam. The 2013 Elan 350 is 1.53m longer than the 1981 Ericson 30+. The 2013 Elan 350 displaces approximately 49% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Ericson 30+ has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.79 and 39.7 m² of sail area. The 2013 Elan 350, with an SA/D of 17.65 and 58.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2013 Elan 350 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Ericson 30+ offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.76). The 2013 Elan 350 has a comfort ratio of 19.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 41.1% for the 1981 Ericson 30+ and 30.3% for the 2013 Elan 350, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Ericson 30+ provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 2013 Elan 350 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Ericson 30+ is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2013 Elan 350 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Ericson 30+ · 2013 Elan 350