1981 Pearson 303 vs 1984 O'Day 30 — Comparison

1981 Pearson 3031981 Pearson 303
VS
1984 O'Day 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Pearson 3031984 O'Day 30
General
ManufacturerPearsonO'Day
Year1981–19861984–1989
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam ShawC. Raymond Hunt
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Ballast1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)1,452 kg (3,201 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.8 m² (428 ft²)36.0 m² (388 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 303
16.45
1984 O'Day 30
15.49
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 303
41.18
1984 O'Day 30
40.01
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 303
0.78
1984 O'Day 30
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 303
20.57
1984 O'Day 30
19.36

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 303 and 1984 O'Day 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 303 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the 1984 O'Day 30 is a 1980s offering from O'Day from USA. The 1981 Pearson 303 was penned by William Shaw. The 1984 O'Day 30 was designed by C. Raymond Hunt.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 303 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1984 O'Day 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1981 Pearson 303 displaces approximately 6% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 303 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.45 and 39.8 m² of sail area. The 1984 O'Day 30, with an SA/D of 15.49 and 36.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1981 Pearson 303 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 303 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The 1984 O'Day 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1981 Pearson 303 and 40.0% for the 1984 O'Day 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 303 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1984 O'Day 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Pearson 303 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1981 Pearson 303 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 O'Day 30 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Pearson 303 · 1984 O'Day 30