1981 Pearson 303 vs Catalina 28 — Comparison

1981 Pearson 3031981 Pearson 303
VS
Catalina 28Catalina 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1981 Pearson 303Catalina 28
General
ManufacturerPearsonCatalina
Year1981–19861998–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam ShawGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)8.69 m (28.5 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.90 m (9.5 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)2,812 kg (6,199 lbs)
Ballast1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area39.8 m² (428 ft²)33.5 m² (361 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1981 Pearson 303
16.45
Catalina 28
17.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1981 Pearson 303
41.18
Catalina 28
40.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1981 Pearson 303
0.78
Catalina 28
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1981 Pearson 303
20.57
Catalina 28
16.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1981 Pearson 303 and Catalina 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 303 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the Catalina 28 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1981 Pearson 303 was penned by William Shaw. The Catalina 28 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 303 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Catalina 28 at 8.69m (28.5ft) with a 2.90m beam. The 1981 Pearson 303 is 0.45m longer than the Catalina 28. The 1981 Pearson 303 displaces approximately 37% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 303 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.45 and 39.8 m² of sail area. The Catalina 28, with an SA/D of 17.09 and 33.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 303 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.6) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.78). The Catalina 28 has a comfort ratio of 16.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 41.2% for the 1981 Pearson 303 and 40.3% for the Catalina 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 303 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The Catalina 28 offers 6 berths in 1 cabin with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Pearson 303 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1981 Pearson 303 · Catalina 28